The private Form of the new Specialist Survey (PST-Q) is made by the Fernandez-Alvarez mais aussi al

(2003), and you can was created to evaluate “brand new gang of features that each counselor enforce in just about any psychotherapeutic condition, for this reason creating a portion of the attributes of the fresh new therapeutic act” (p. 117). The fresh new questionnaire assesses four additional proportions: flexibility-firmness (Academic subscale), distance-intimacy (Expressive subscale), minimal wedding-higher wedding (Wedding subscale), wider focused-slim focused (Attentional subscale) and you can impulsive-structured (Surgical xcheaters free trial subscale). This really is a good thirty six-items mind-statement measure done from the practitioners with responses ranked toward an effective measure anywhere between 1 (total dispute)so you’re able to 7 (overall agreement). New scale has shown an examination-retest accuracy of .79, which have Chronbach’s accuracy coefficients per subscale, the following; instructional, .69; expressive, .75; involvement, .78; attentional, .80; operative, .78. Foundation Studies revealed an excellent KMO = .756 (Pick Table step one to own alphas in the current study).

Functioning Alliance Directory-Brief Mode (WAI-S)

The working Alliance Index (WAI), developed by Horvath Greenberg (1986), is actually good 36 items questionnaire which can be administered to help you one another subscribers and you will practitioners that is rated on a good eight-point Likert kind of measure from1 (never)in order to seven (always). Tracey and you will Kokotovic (1989) advised an individual and you will specialist Operating Alliance Directory-Small Setting (WAI-S), which contains five things for every subscale (Activity, Purpose, and Thread) and you may full WAI-S results, proving high accuracy that have alpha accounts similar to, as well as much better than the newest WAI to your specialist subscales and you may complete mediocre results (Activity, leader = .83; Thread, leader = .91; Mission, leader = .88; and you may General Alliance, alpha = .95). Find Dining table step one to have alphas in today’s studies.

Procedure Record (TL)

The strategy List measure try modified from Hollis (1995), whom catalogued an intensive list of counseling and you will therapy processes representing a general spectrum of philosophical basics. To help you refine that it extensive record considering techniques put particularly by the cognitive behavioral and you can constructivist medication orientations, i hired counseling therapy scholar youngsters to learn the complete variety of 108 treatment process and rate the brand new extent that per technique is utilized by for each therapeutic strategy (cognitive behavioral and you can constructivist), having fun with good 5-part Likert method of scale from one (Never otherwise Hardly ever) so you’re able to 5 (Constantly or More often than not).


Sixteen counseling psychology graduate students participated in these ratings (six men, 10 women), with the Mage = (SD = 2.67). Results of a paired differences analysis for all 108 items indicated that there were 77 techniques rated as being used with significantly differential frequency by cognitive behavioral and constructivist therapies. We then divided this distribution of 77 techniques into quartiles and retained the top and bottom quartiles. This resulted in 20 cognitive behavioral techniques (e.g.advice giving, rational restructuring) and 20 constructivist techniques (e.g. emotional processing, reflection) that were rated most significantly different (cognitive behavioral vs. constructivist). This final list of 40 items of therapy techniques (20 cognitive behavioral techniques; 20 constructivist techniques) was used in the current study.

Such 40 affairs was basically listed alphabetically and you may users have been questioned so you can rate the latest the quantity that they use each techniques within their habit of medication collectively an excellent 5-point level from (Never otherwise Almost never)so you can 5 (Always or Almost always). Brand new analysis of the 20 rationalist situations was in fact summed and a great suggest is actually calculated so you can echo an average regularity of utilizing rationalist treatments (you can easily assortment = 1-5), and the same processes was used when it comes to the 20 constructivist interventions.

The new brutal data was applied so you’re able to carry out a great confirmatory basis data with the Process Listing measure. The modern data try checked-out for multiple-variate normalcy and also the presumptions was indeed found. All kurtosis quotes for the parameters fell anywhere between step 1 and –step 1 variables except constructivist situations twelve, 13, sixteen, and you will 20 and you may intellectual behavioral items 3, which had an excellent kurtosis thinking ranging from dos and you may –dos. For that reason, this type of four activities had been taken off the fresh size ahead of powering the new confirmatory basis studies.